[ad_1]
NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court docket on Thursday expressed grave concern over the pittance of pension — between Rs 15,000 and Rs 25,000— obtained by retired HC judges, who had been appointed as HC judges after spending their complete life within the district judiciary.
These issues had been expressed by a bench of CJI D Y Chandrachud, and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra after amicus curiae Okay Parameshwar sought early decision of the problems referring to pensions of district judges, who get appointed as HC judges.The amicus had been advocating upward revision of the pension commensurate with the dignity of district judges.
With each legal professional normal R Venkataramani and solicitor normal Tushar Mehta current earlier than the bench, CJI Chandrachud made an impassioned request to the highest legislation officers to make use of their good workplaces for a passable decision of the vexed subject.
When the AG stated the govt. wanted a while to ponder over the difficulty which has a number of dimensions together with enormous monetary burden, the CJI stated, “I see your predicament. However take a look at the individuals from district judiciary who after being appointed as HC judges have a tenure of lower than 4 to 5 years. They get a pension of Rs 15-25,000. Their tenure within the district judiciary isn’t counted. Now we have a slew of petitions by such retired HC judges.”
“To get a pension of Rs 15-25,000 after spending your entire life within the judiciary is not any social safety for them. Have a look at the profile of such retired HC judges. They, besides a number of who could be counted on fingertips, don’t return to observe nor do arbitration work after retirement. My earnest enchantment to each of you (AG and SG) to sit down down with the involved officers (of the ministry) and look at the difficulty to reach at an inexpensive resolution,” the CJI stated.
Although the AG reiterated that the difficulty entails a number of features, the SG stated he and the AG would absolutely look at the problems concerned concerning the pension. The CJI stated, “We do perceive the monetary implications. However because the Supreme Court docket, we should additionally discharge our duties because the guardian of the judiciary,” he stated and posted the matter for listening to on Aug 27.
These issues had been expressed by a bench of CJI D Y Chandrachud, and Justices J B Pardiwala and Manoj Misra after amicus curiae Okay Parameshwar sought early decision of the problems referring to pensions of district judges, who get appointed as HC judges.The amicus had been advocating upward revision of the pension commensurate with the dignity of district judges.
With each legal professional normal R Venkataramani and solicitor normal Tushar Mehta current earlier than the bench, CJI Chandrachud made an impassioned request to the highest legislation officers to make use of their good workplaces for a passable decision of the vexed subject.
When the AG stated the govt. wanted a while to ponder over the difficulty which has a number of dimensions together with enormous monetary burden, the CJI stated, “I see your predicament. However take a look at the individuals from district judiciary who after being appointed as HC judges have a tenure of lower than 4 to 5 years. They get a pension of Rs 15-25,000. Their tenure within the district judiciary isn’t counted. Now we have a slew of petitions by such retired HC judges.”
“To get a pension of Rs 15-25,000 after spending your entire life within the judiciary is not any social safety for them. Have a look at the profile of such retired HC judges. They, besides a number of who could be counted on fingertips, don’t return to observe nor do arbitration work after retirement. My earnest enchantment to each of you (AG and SG) to sit down down with the involved officers (of the ministry) and look at the difficulty to reach at an inexpensive resolution,” the CJI stated.
Although the AG reiterated that the difficulty entails a number of features, the SG stated he and the AG would absolutely look at the problems concerned concerning the pension. The CJI stated, “We do perceive the monetary implications. However because the Supreme Court docket, we should additionally discharge our duties because the guardian of the judiciary,” he stated and posted the matter for listening to on Aug 27.
[ad_2]
This Publish could include copywrite
