[ad_1]
India males’s hockey goalkeeper PR Sreejesh might have been the discuss of the city following India’s victory over Nice Britain within the quarterfinal on the Paris Olympics 2024, however opposing goalkeeper Ollie Payne additionally made headlines. The Nice Britain goalkeeper was underneath the microscope, as he was initially allowed to maintain an iPad with him throughout the shootout, which was protested by the Indian workforce. The referees – who’ve come underneath scrutiny from Hockey India – then determined to confiscate the machine, earlier than India took their second penalty.
Hockey India president Dilip Tirkey voiced his opinion on the incident, calling it a disturbance that have to be averted,
“In keeping with the principles, notepads shouldn’t be stored on the facet the place the shootout is occurring. This may trigger a disturbance. Such high-level matches require extra cautious umpiring,” mentioned Tirkey.
Former Olympic medalist Gagan Narang took to social media to credit score assist employees member Shivendra Singh, who had noticed the Nice Britain workforce utilizing the iPad throughout the shootout.
“With out taking something away from the gamers, Shivendra Singh’s eager statement abilities throughout the shootout performed an enormous function in having an iPad taken off the sphere of play,” wrote Narang.
“Such efforts by the backroom employees deserves boundless reward,” he added.
Hockey India increase concern concerning refereeing
Hockey India additionally launched an announcement on Sunday, highlighting severe concern concerning the usual of umpiring and decision-making on the Olympics. Hockey India raised issues concerning the inconsistent utilization of video evaluations within the case of defender Amit Rohidas being proven a crimson card, in addition to the usage of the iPad by Ollie Payne.
Assertion:
Inconsistent Video Umpire Evaluations
Hockey India highlighted the inconsistent software of video umpire evaluations, notably pointing to the crimson card choice towards an Indian participant (Amit Rohidas). This inconsistency has eroded belief within the video evaluation system amongst gamers, coaches, and followers.
Rohidas was proven a crimson card after the video umpire made a subjective choice that the stick was a deliberate try to harm a participant by elevating the stick. Many observers felt that Rohidas’s motion was a part of his biomechanical motion and never deliberate.
Teaching Throughout Shoot-Out
One other level of competition was the teaching of the Nice Britain goalkeeper from behind the goalpost throughout the shoot-out. Such actions are seen as a breach of truthful play and have raised questions in regards to the integrity of the match, Hockey India mentioned in its assertion.
Use of a Video Pill by Goalkeeper
The usage of a video pill by the Nice Britain goalkeeper throughout the shoot-out has additionally come underneath scrutiny. This uncommon apply has raised issues about adherence to the principles and the equity of the competitors.
Subjects talked about on this article
[ad_2]
